Dave Gorman illustrates the risks of drunken bearded Googlewhacking.

08.9.2008 | 8:20 pm | Great Beards in History, Pogonophobia

You’ve got to be a pretty lonely and bored individual to take up Googlewhacking with any seriousness. What’s Googlewhacking you ask? Googlewhacking is where you do a Google search for two words and get just one result, or to quote Googleswhack.com, “Your goal: find that elusive query (two words - no quote marks) with a single, solitary result!”

Apparently, this was some type of fad back in the early part of this decade. I guess I missed it being too busy, you know, having a life. It would make sense then for a man drawn to such an obsessive compulsive and private pursuit to probably end up with a beard. Who has time to shave when you’re endlessly pairing obscure words together to find a Googlewhack?

Around 2003, English comic Dave Gorman got into Googlewhacking, grew a beard, and then decided to write a book about his search for other Googlewhackers called “Dave Gorman’s Googlewhack Adventure.” He also created a one-man powerpoint/stand-up show to help promote the book. As it usually does with great British comedy (Ali G, The Office) it takes a while for it to get across the pond. Anyway, better late than never, here’s a clip from the show where Dave explains why he’s going to be bearded for life.

Also, as a challenge to the pathologically bored that might be reading this, see how much of a Googlewhack you can get using the word “beard.” Here’s the best I got:

dommerers beards: 1 of 5 results

Most Googlewhacks make no sense, but I thought it’s more interesting if it does. A dommerer is a person who pretends to be a deaf, mute just to get money. I thought that dommerers would have beards, you know, for effect.  Alas, still not a true Googlewhack.

M. Meschery

4 Comments »

  1. googlewhack this:

    behive beardz

    2 solitary entries…

    I just… need… more… time……. arghhh!!!

    Comment by Shahid | 08.9.2008 | 8:43 pm

  2. douchenozzle dubnation

    From FTB and in less than 20 minutes. I need a new hobby.

    Comment by admin | 08.10.2008 | 8:19 pm

  3. and, neither of those words are in ye ol’ Websters. I can still appreciate though.

    Comment by matthewmeschery | 08.10.2008 | 10:32 pm

  4. I suspected that you would call me on that. But I’m not done. The combo of “pogonophobia consigliere” (no quotes) only returned four. And two were for the same FTB article…

    Comment by admin | 08.10.2008 | 10:53 pm

 

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.